Search Results for "statutory arbitration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "statutory arbitration"

1552 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1552 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Dispute Over Partnership Deed. Arbitration Clause in Partnership Deed Found Valid and Binding on Parties Despite Allegations of Fraud and Non-Signatory Status.

6 Jul 2026

The applicants, Hemant D. Shah HUF and Kokila H. Shah, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications to Appoint Arbitrator in LLP and Trust Dispute Over School Management Agreements. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause in School Management Services Agreement Binds Non-Signatory Trust Due to Interconnected Agreements.

23 Dec 2022

The judgment concerns two arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Edufocus International Edu...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Challenge to Arbitral Award in Indian Premier League Franchise Dispute. Award Directed Payment of Damages and Interest to Franchisee; Petition Alleges Patent Illegality and Excess of Jurisdiction by Arbitrator.

16 Jun 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body for crick...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction Under Section 16 and Order Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11; Alternative Remedies U/S 34 and Article 136 Must Be Availed. The court found that an order under Section 11 is challengeable only before the Supreme Court under Article 136, and a Section 16 order can be contested after the award under Section 34, thus barring writ jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2023

This writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), a government enterprise, and a joint ventu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Transport Agreement Dispute Despite Alleged Settlement. Arbitration clause survives termination of contract and disputes regarding compensation are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Oct 2010

The applicant, United Shippers Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

20 Apr 2021

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Family Dispute Over Partnership and Company Matters — Mediation Failed. Court holds that disputes arising from Deed of Family Settlement and Partnership Deed are arbitrable and that non-signatory companies can be joined as parties to arbitration.

20 Jun 2013

The case involves two groups of the same family, the CPS group (Chandrakant Phoolchand Sanghvi and others) and the APS group (Anilkumar Phoolchand San...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Termination of Arbitral Proceedings Under ICA Maritime Rules — Rule 20 Time Limit Not Absolute; Delay-Causing Party Cannot Insist on Termination. Arbitral Tribunal's Rejection of Termination Application Upheld as Party Which Caused Delay Through Interlocutory Applications Cannot Rely on Two-Year Limit Under Rule 20(1) of the Maritime Arbitration Rules.

20 Apr 2010

The case arose from a charter party executed on 6 November 2006 between Rashtriya Chemical Fertilizers Ltd., a public sector undertaking, and J.S. Oce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)