Search Results for "slum rehabilitation authority"

281 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 281 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MHADA's Land Allotment for Housing Society Redevelopment Under MHADA Act, 1976. Court upholds MHADA's power to allot land and rejects allegations of illegality and lack of locus standi.

The judgment pertains to two petitions, Writ Petition No. 3 of 2013 filed by Shreeprakash Ramganesh Dube and Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2013...