High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "section 326"
1071 result(s) found
Found 1071 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act
27 Apr 2018The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Accused's Appeals Against Conviction under Sections 302, 307 Read with 34 IPC Arising from Property Dispute. Admissibility of Medical Certificate and Nature of Injuries Key to Determining Guilt.
11 Dec 2006The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals filed by a father and his three sons challenging their conviction and sentence under Secti...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 53
High Court
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements. Dishonour of Cheque Complaint Quashed as Notice of Demand Was Not Served Within 15 Days of Receipt of Information of Dishonour as Required Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
22 Dec 2006The applicant, Smt. Ramilaben Trikamlal Shah, filed a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agains...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.
10 Mar 2016The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...
- 50
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Employer in Arbitration Award Dispute — Award Upheld as No Error of Law Apparent on Face. Arbitrator's Award Not Set Aside Despite Limitation Defense Under Section 326 of U.P. Act 2 of 1916; No Legal Proposition Formed Basis of Award.
20 Aug 1969The dispute arose from a construction contract for pumping stations and reservoirs at Kanpur between the appellant, Kanpur Nagar Mahapalika (formerly ...
- 13
