Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements. Dishonour of Cheque Complaint Quashed as Notice of Demand Was Not Served Within 15 Days of Receipt of Information of Dishonour as Required Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 61
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Smt. Ramilaben Trikamlal Shah, filed a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents, including a partnership firm and its partners, for dishonour of a cheque. The learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate issued process against the accused. The applicant challenged the order dated 19th June 2006 passed by the Magistrate. The respondents filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the complaint. The main issue was whether the notice of demand was served within 15 days of the receipt of information regarding dishonour as required under Section 138(b) of the Act. The court examined the dates: the cheque was dishonoured on 7th February 2005, the applicant received the cheque return memo on 9th February 2005, but the notice was sent only on 25th February 2005, which was beyond the 15-day period. The court held that the requirement of serving notice within 15 days is mandatory and the complaint was not maintainable. Consequently, the court allowed the application and quashed the complaint.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Notice of Demand - Section 138(b) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The complaint under Section 138 was quashed as the notice of demand was not served within 15 days of the receipt of information regarding dishonour of the cheque. The court held that the requirement of serving notice within 15 days is mandatory and non-compliance renders the complaint not maintainable. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is maintainable when the notice of demand was not served within 15 days of the receipt of information regarding the dishonour of the cheque.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The complaint and the order issuing process are quashed.

Law Points

  • Notice of demand must be served within 15 days of receipt of information of dishonour
  • Section 138(b) Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Quashing under Section 482 CrPC
  • Complaint not maintainable if notice period not complied with
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (12) 66

Criminal Application No. 2677 of 2006

2006-12-22

Abhay S. Oka

Mr. U. P. Warunjikar for applicant, M. J. P. Shah i/b M/s. JPS Legal for respondent nos. 2 & 3, Mr. A. S. Shitole, APP for State

Smt. Ramilaben Trikamlal Shah

M/s. Tube & Allied Products and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of complaint under Section 138 NI Act

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the complaint and the order issuing process

Filing Reason

Non-compliance with mandatory notice requirement under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Previous Decisions

The learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate issued process against the accused on 19th June 2006

Issues

Whether the notice of demand was served within 15 days of receipt of information of dishonour as required under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the notice was sent within time. The respondents argued that the notice was not served within 15 days of receipt of information of dishonour, making the complaint not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 that the notice of demand must be served within 15 days of the receipt of information regarding the dishonour of the cheque is mandatory. Non-compliance renders the complaint not maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The requirement of serving notice within 15 days is mandatory and non-compliance renders the complaint not maintainable.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate issued process on 19th June 2006. The respondents filed this application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the complaint. The court heard the application and passed the order on 22nd December 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138, 141
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements. Dishonour of Cheque Complaint Quashed as Notice of Demand Was Not Served Within 15 Days of Receipt of Information of Dis...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Amended Recruitment Rules Equating Posts of Principal and Joint Chief Inspector of Factories as Infructuous Due to Retirement of Employee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Mala Fide; Period Between Transfer and Superan...