Search Results for "revision against conviction"

932 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 932 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Housebreaking and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 457 and 380 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The petitioner, Thippeswamy @ Kunta Thippaga, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Challakere in C.C.No.898/2010 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Conviction Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The revision petition was filed by Smt. Gouri, the accused, challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S Ramesh Kumar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Sets Aside Conviction Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. The court held that without proper service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the conviction cannot be sustained.

The case involves a dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, Vinodkumar Rathi, alleged that the accused, M/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Order Rejecting Discharge Application for Non-Compliance with Sections 226 and 227 Cr.P.C. — Mandatory Hearing Before Framing of Charge in Sessions Case

The revision petitioner, Balam Gulab Pathan, was the original accused in a sessions case for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape Under Section 376 IPC — Reverses Acquittal by Sessions Court. Minor Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Kalyan Mahipati Madne against his conviction under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Revision Applications Against Defamation Complaints — Complaints Under Section 499 IPC Not Barred by Limitation as Each Publication Constitutes a Separate Offence.

The applicant, Valmiki Faleiro, filed four criminal revision applications challenging the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Margao, takin...