Search Results for "review petition"

6047 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6047 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Payment — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument on merits not permitted.

The judgment concerns a batch of review petitions filed against a common judgment dated 18th December 2013 passed by the Bombay High Court in several ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Trust Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Direction to Implead Trustee in Appeal Before Charity Commissioner Upheld as Petitioner Was Already Represented by Trust.

The judgment concerns a review petition filed by Ganesh N. Salunkhe against an order dated 4 February 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 174 of 2015. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Human Rights Act Case — Non-Consideration of Arguments Not a Ground for Review. Review petitioners sought review of order in W.P.No.11248 of 2021 under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, but court held no error apparent.

The review application was filed by two police officers, M.Venkatesan and Elangovan, seeking review of an order dated 21.11.2025 passed by the Madras ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Condoned Delay in Filing Review Application and Dismissed Review as Not Maintainable Against Order Directing Reinstatement of Employee Whose Caste Claim Was Invalidated. The Court Held That Review Lies Only for Error Apparent on Record, Not for Reappreciation of Evidence.

The judgment pertains to Civil Application No. 1168 of 2015 filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gondia and the Medical Officer, Prim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute Over Will — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC cannot be used to re-argue the case or correct erroneous findings unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants (original appellants) filed a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process.

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Provision for Review Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Review petition under Section 114 CPC held not maintainable against order under Sections 27(1) and 27(2) of the Act.

The review petitioner, National Insurance Company Limited, filed a review petition under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking reca...