Search Results for "reopening accounts"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Auction Purchaser in SARFAESI Act Case — High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition Despite Alternative Remedy. Restoration of Securitization Application After Full Payment and Sale Certificate Issuance Held Improper.

The appeal arises from an order of the Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, which set aside the DRT's order dismi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Orders Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Sanction and Non-Application of Mind. Reassessment proceedings initiated without proper approval under Section 151(2) and based on borrowed satisfaction are invalid.

The petitioner, Ashok Commercial Enterprises, filed nine writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 19th July 2021 and 14th July 2021 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Independent Application of Mind. Reassessment Based on Borrowed Satisfaction and Non-Speaking Order on Objections Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Arvind Sahdeo Gupta, challenged a notice dated 24/3/2020 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Independent Application of Mind. Reopening Based on Borrowed Satisfaction from Search Action Without Proper Inquiry Held Invalid Under Section 148A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Anurag Gupta, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2018-19 under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Income Tax Case for Non-Compliance with GKN Driveshafts Procedure. Revenue failed to communicate order rejecting objections and passed assessment order within four weeks, violating principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent reassessment order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Notice Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Limitation Period Expired for Original Assessment Order. Reassessment Order Does Not Extend Limitation for Revising Original Assessment Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 April 2009 issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nashik under Section 263 of ...