Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes RTA Order Rejecting Stage Carriage Permit Applications on Notified Routes — Remands for Fresh Consideration. RTA Must Independently Apply Mind and Not Merely Rely on Objections of State Transport Undertakings Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sree Gajanana Motor Transport Company Limited, a stage carriage operator, applied for four stage carriage permits on routes including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Externment Orders for Lack of Material and Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Externment orders under Section 56 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 quashed as based on insufficient material and without supplying documents.

The judgment concerns multiple criminal writ petitions filed by individuals challenging externment orders passed against them under Section 56 of the ...