Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Externment Orders for Lack of Material and Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Externment orders under Section 56 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 quashed as based on insufficient material and without supplying documents.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 173
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns multiple criminal writ petitions filed by individuals challenging externment orders passed against them under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The petitioners, residents of Simplex Building in Mumbai, were externed from the Brihan Mumbai area for varying periods. The common ground of challenge was that the externment orders were based on insufficient and stale material, and that the petitioners were not supplied with copies of the in-camera statements or other documents relied upon by the externing authority, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court examined the records and found that the externment orders were passed without proper application of mind. The material relied upon consisted of vague allegations and old incidents, which did not justify the subjective satisfaction that the petitioners were likely to commit offences. The court held that the failure to supply the relied-upon documents to the petitioners vitiated the orders. Consequently, the court allowed the petitions, quashed the externment orders, and directed that the petitioners be allowed to return to their places of residence.

Headnote

A) Bombay Police Act - Externment - Section 56 - Validity of Externment Order - Externment order must be based on credible material and not on mere suspicion or stale incidents - Held that the orders were passed without proper application of mind and without supplying relevant documents, thus violative of principles of natural justice (Paras 5-10).

B) Natural Justice - Right to Hearing - Supply of Documents - Failure to supply documents relied upon by the authority vitiates the externment order - Held that the petitioners were not given copies of the in-camera statements or other material, rendering the orders unsustainable (Paras 7-9).

C) Bombay Police Act - Section 56 - Subjective Satisfaction - The subjective satisfaction of the externing authority must be based on objective material - Held that the material on record did not justify the satisfaction that the petitioners were likely to commit offences (Paras 6-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the externment orders passed under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 were valid when based on insufficient material and without supplying relevant documents to the externees.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions, quashed the externment orders, and directed that the petitioners be allowed to return to their places of residence.

Law Points

  • Externment order must be based on credible material
  • not mere suspicion
  • failure to supply relied-upon documents violates natural justice
  • externment cannot be based on stale or trivial incidents
  • subjective satisfaction of authority must be based on objective material.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (05) 135

Criminal Writ Petition No.1333 of 2004, Criminal Writ Petition No.1334 of 2004, Criminal Writ Petition No.1335 of 2004, Criminal Writ Petition No.1344 of 2004, Criminal Writ Petition No.1350 of 2004, Criminal Writ Petition No.1619 of 2004

0000-00-00

Ms Anjali Patil, Shri D.S. Mhaispurkar, Shri A.R. Pande, Shri Bharat Mehta

Suresh Sham Singh, Malika Khan, A.A.R. Malik, Smt. Rajanigandha alias Rita Singh, A. Nayak, Smt. Raji Swamy Shetty, Smt. Latarani Babu Nadawala

Shri A.N. Roy, Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai; The Sr. Inspector of Police, Dr. D.B. Marg Police Station; State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of externment orders and permission to return to their residences.

Filing Reason

Externment orders were passed without sufficient material and without supplying relied-upon documents, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

Externment orders were passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai.

Issues

Whether the externment orders under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 were validly passed based on credible material. Whether the failure to supply documents relied upon by the authority vitiates the externment order.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the externment orders were based on insufficient and stale material, and that they were not supplied with copies of in-camera statements or other documents. Respondents argued that the orders were passed after due consideration of material and in the interest of public order.

Ratio Decidendi

An externment order under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 must be based on credible material and not on mere suspicion or stale incidents. Failure to supply documents relied upon by the authority violates principles of natural justice and renders the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The externment orders were passed without proper application of mind and without supplying relevant documents, thus violative of principles of natural justice. The material on record did not justify the satisfaction that the petitioners were likely to commit offences.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging externment orders passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 56
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of KSPCB Chairman Based on Alleged Resignation — Finds No Voluntary Resignation and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the Chairman of a statutory board cannot be removed without following ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals by University and Colleges in Assistant Professor Recruitment Dispute — UGC Regulation 10 Applicable for Awarding Marks for Teaching Experience Under Table 3A.