Search Results for "municipal demolition"

460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief and Arbitrator Appointment in Redevelopment Dispute -- Section 9 and Section 11 of Arbitration Act Applications Denied

The High Court dismissed both petitions filed by Petitioner against Respondents -- The Petitioner sought interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Illegal Building Collapse Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Culpable Homicide and Long Incarceration. Court Held That Section 304 IPC Requires Knowledge of Likely Death, Which Was Not Established Against the Applicants.

The judgment concerns three bail applications filed by accused persons arrested in connection with the collapse of an illegally constructed building i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Structure. Notice under Section 351 of the Municipal Corporation Act for covering open space with shed held valid as plaintiff failed to prove long-standing existence or authorization.

The appellant, Mohammed Kasam, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court seeking a declaration that a notice dated 15.11.1997 issued by the Municipa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 351 Available.

The petitioner, Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 1st August...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Environmental Protection in Public Interest Litigation Regarding Construction on Agricultural Land. Court Directs Demolition of Unauthorized Structures and Restoration of Land to Original Condition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Universities Act, 1983 and Environmental Laws.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL No. 34/2010) initiated suo motu by the court and a connected Writ P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Lack of Proper Hearing Under MMC Act. Court Holds That Show-Cause Notice Must Be Served on All Occupiers and That Demolition Without Considering Objections Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicant, who is the trustee of Jaliwali Masjid and Arbi Madarsa, along with other indivi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.

The petitioners, Raul Aires Fernandes and John Aires Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 30 March 2016 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition of Tenanted Premises Without Notice. Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Due Process Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Before Demolishing Structures Occupied by Tenants.

The petitioners, Mrs. Lilly P. Pandit, Mr. Ivan D'Souza, and Mr. Abbas Masalawala, are tenants residing in rooms on the ground floor of 30 Mistry Buil...