Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Lack of Proper Hearing Under MMC Act. Court Holds That Show-Cause Notice Must Be Served on All Occupiers and That Demolition Without Considering Objections Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 28
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicant, who is the trustee of Jaliwali Masjid and Arbi Madarsa, along with other individuals, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. The dispute arose from a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Corporation under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, for alleged unauthorized construction. The applicants contended that the notice was not served on all occupiers and that their objections were not considered before the demolition order was passed. The court examined the procedural requirements under Section 351, which mandates that the Commissioner must give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to all persons likely to be affected by the demolition. The court found that the Corporation had failed to serve the show-cause notice on all occupiers and had not properly considered the objections raised. The court held that the demolition order was in violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter back to the Corporation for fresh consideration after giving proper notice and hearing to all concerned parties.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Demolition of Structure - Show-Cause Notice - Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - The court considered whether the demolition order was valid when notice was not served on all occupiers and objections were not considered - Held that the Corporation must serve notice on all occupiers and consider objections before demolition, otherwise the order is violative of natural justice (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order of demolition passed by the Municipal Corporation without serving show-cause notice on all occupiers and without considering objections is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the civil revision application, set aside the impugned demolition order, and remanded the matter to the Municipal Corporation for fresh consideration after giving proper notice and hearing to all occupiers.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show-cause notice
  • Demolition
  • Municipal Corporation
  • Occupiers
  • Hearing
  • Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1888
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 19

Civil Revision Application No. 154 of 2017

0000-00-00

Mr.S.S. (incomplete)

Jaliwali Masjid and Arbi Madarsa, Haji Abdul Razzaque s/o Haji Ahmed Chhapra, Hasham Noor Mohammed Chowhan, Mohammed Farooque Bismilla Khan

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Assistant Commissioner, Ward Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs, Mohammed Ali s/o Tayyab

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision application challenging demolition order passed by Municipal Corporation under Section 351 of MMC Act.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the demolition order and direction to the Corporation to hear the applicants before demolition.

Filing Reason

The applicants alleged that the demolition notice was not served on all occupiers and their objections were not considered.

Previous Decisions

The trial court had dismissed the applicants' challenge, leading to the revision.

Issues

Whether the show-cause notice under Section 351 of MMC Act was properly served on all occupiers? Whether the demolition order without considering objections violates natural justice?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that notice was not served on all occupiers and objections were not considered. Respondents argued that notice was served and due process was followed.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, the Commissioner must give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to all persons likely to be affected by a demolition order. Failure to serve notice on all occupiers and consider objections renders the order violative of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The show-cause notice must be served on all occupiers likely to be affected. Demolition without considering objections is violative of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The applicants filed a civil revision application in the High Court against the order of the trial court which had upheld the demolition notice issued by the Municipal Corporation.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: 351
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Lack of Proper Hearing Under MMC Act. Court Holds That Show-Cause Notice Must Be Served on All Occupiers and That Demolition Without Considering Objections Violat...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 19...