Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Illegal Building Collapse Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Culpable Homicide and Long Incarceration. Court Held That Section 304 IPC Requires Knowledge of Likely Death, Which Was Not Established Against the Applicants.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns three bail applications filed by accused persons arrested in connection with the collapse of an illegally constructed building in Thane, which resulted in 74 deaths and 62 injuries. The applicants, Abdul Salim Shaikh, Jamil Ahmed Jamaluddin Shaikh, Haddisullah Raggibullah Chaudhary, and Abdul Hakim Mohd. Naseer Chaudhari, were partners in a construction business and had constructed two buildings, 'Adarsh A' and 'Adarsh B', without obtaining permission from the Thane Municipal Corporation. They were arrested in April 2013 and had been in custody for over 18 months. The prosecution alleged that the applicants had illegally procured land from adivasis and constructed the buildings with connivance of municipal officers. The applicants sought bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court examined the prima facie case against the applicants, particularly the applicability of Section 304 IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder). The court noted that the prosecution had not produced evidence to show that the applicants had knowledge that their act of constructing the building was likely to cause death. The court distinguished between cases of rash and negligent act (Section 304A) and culpable homicide (Section 304), holding that the latter requires a higher degree of mens rea. Since the trial was not likely to conclude soon and the applicants had already been in custody for a significant period, the court granted bail to all applicants on certain conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and surety, and not tampering with evidence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Unlawful Construction - Section 439 CrPC - Applicants charged under Sections 304, 308, 338, 337, 120B IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act - Court held that prima facie case under Section 304 IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) was not made out as there was no evidence of knowledge that the construction was likely to cause death - Bail granted considering long incarceration of over 18 months and no likelihood of trial concluding soon (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicants are entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC in a case involving collapse of an illegally constructed building resulting in deaths and injuries, considering the nature of allegations and period of custody.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted to all applicants on conditions including furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, not leaving India without court permission, and not tampering with evidence.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Unlawful Construction
  • Culpable Homicide
  • Section 304 IPC
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Long Incarceration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (10) 67

Criminal Bail Application No.850 of 2014, Criminal Bail Application No.179 of 2014, Criminal Bail Application No.236 of 2014

2014-10-28

Abhay M. Thipsay

Mr. Majeed Memon, Sr. Advocate with Mohd. Shine i/b MZM Legal for applicant in BA 850/14; Mr. N.P. Dalvi, Advocate for applicant in BA 179/14; Mr. Niteen Pradhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. S.D. Khot & Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan, Advocates for applicant in BA 236/14; Ms. S.V. Sonawane, APP for Respondent State in BA 179/14 and 236/14; Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for Respondent State in BA 850/14; Mr. Shishir Hiray, Special P.P. in all matters

Abdul Salim Shaikh (Siddique), Jamil Ahmed Jamaluddin Shaikh, Haddisullah Raggibullah Chaudhary, Abdul Hakim Mohd. Naseer Chaudhari

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail applications under Section 439 CrPC for offences arising from collapse of an illegally constructed building.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought bail from the High Court after being in custody for over 18 months.

Filing Reason

Applicants were arrested for constructing a building without municipal permission, which collapsed causing deaths and injuries.

Issues

Whether the applicants have made out a case for bail under Section 439 CrPC. Whether the offence under Section 304 IPC is prima facie made out against the applicants.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that they have been in custody for over 18 months and trial is not likely to conclude soon. Prosecution opposed bail citing gravity of offence and that applicants may tamper with evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 304 IPC, the prosecution must establish that the accused had knowledge that the act was likely to cause death. In the absence of such evidence, the case may fall under Section 304A IPC (rash and negligent act) which is bailable. Long incarceration without trial also weighs in favor of bail.

Judgment Excerpts

The case relates to the collapse of a building that was being constructed illegally without permission from the Municipal Corporation of Thane. 74 persons died in the mishap and 62 were injured.

Procedural History

The applicants were arrested in April 2013. They filed bail applications before the Sessions Court which were rejected. They then approached the High Court by filing these bail applications. The High Court reserved order on 20th August 2014 and pronounced on 28th October 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 304, 308, 338, 337, 120B
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: 3, 4, 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Illegal Building Collapse Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Culpable Homicide and Long Incarceration. Court Held That Section 304 IPC Requires Knowledge of Likely Death, Which Was Not Established ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Loan Dispute, Distinguishes Civil Breach from Criminal Offence. Court holds that mere inability to repay loan does not constitute cheating or criminal breach of trust without fraudulent intention from inc...