Search Results for "leasehold property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "leasehold property"

262 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not a Conveyance Under Maharashtra Stamp Act. Agreement for lease with possession does not amount to conveyance under Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and stamp duty is payable under Article 36.

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited, entered into a development agreement-cum-lease deed with respondent No. 3, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Canara Bank v. K.L. Rajgarhia (D) Thru LRs. Agreement to Sell dated 27.12.1984 for construction and sale of flats — Division Bench of Delhi High Court erred in reversing decree for specific performance without considering readiness and willingness of plaintiff and conduct of defendant.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Canara Bank (plaintiff) against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court which had rev...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the development agreement did not grant possession.

4 Mar 2016

The appellants, Prajita Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 14.01.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Decree on Admission in Lease Reversion Rights Dispute — Plaintiffs Entitled to Specific Performance of Clause 6 of Lease Deed. The court held that unequivocal admissions in pleadings regarding payment of full consideration for reversionary rights under a 1981 lease deed entitled the lessee to a decree for conveyance under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.

5 Feb 2014

The plaintiffs, Pankaj Unit No.1 Housing Development Company Private Limited and another, filed a suit seeking specific performance of Clause 6 of a L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

17 Oct 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC — Cause of Action Disclosed. Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because Judge Thinks Plaintiff May Not Succeed; Defence Not Material at This Stage.

29 Jul 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Registration of Transfer of Shares. Held that the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding membership and transfer of shares, and that the society's bye-law amendment requiring prior approval for transfer of shares is valid.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court. The first petition (Writ Petition No. 9116 of 2013) was filed by Farhat Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Held That Acquisition for Housing and Rationing Offices Serves Public Purpose and Compensation Determined Under Act Is Adequate.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. and Express Newspapers Ltd. challenging the acquisition of their land by...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)