Search Results for "judicial delay"

5241 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5241 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Eviction Order Due to Unexplained Delay of 946 Days in Filing Statutory Appeal Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. Condonation of Delay Denied as Appellant Failed to Prove Sufficient Cause for Delay.

The appellant, Rajabhau Shivram Parale, was allotted Plot No. 8 at Great Nag Road, Nagpur on licence by the Central Railway for commercial purposes. O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Considers Challenge to Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Inam Appeal. Question Involves Whether Service Inam Lands Are Exempt from Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954, and Whether Appeal Should Be Decided on Merits Despite Limitation.

The writ petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Service Termination Appeal. Delay of 10 months in filing appeal under Section 81 of Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 not sufficiently explained; Tribunal's refusal to condone delay upheld.

The petitioner, Sayyad Rizwan Sayyad Kasam, was appointed as a Peon in 2011 at Maulana Azad College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Aurangabad, and was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's Multiple Forums and Unexplained Delay of Over Three Years Justified Rejection of Condonation Application.

The petitioner, Popat Sitaram Godge, was terminated from service on 22.05.1994 by the respondent educational institution. Instead of filing an appeal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...