High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "government enterprise"
498 result(s) found
Found 498 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.
18 Jan 2022The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...
- 321
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa University Against Injunction in Easement Dispute. Right of Way Claim Upheld Based on Long User and Necessity Under Indian Easements Act, 1882.
27 Apr 2017The case involves an appeal by Goa University (original defendants) against an order dated 24.06.2016 passed by the District Judge-1, North Goa, Panaj...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arising from Work Contract for Construction of Canal. Clause 30.1 of General Conditions Constitutes an Arbitration Agreement and Disputes Are Not Excepted Matters.
13 Aug 2021The petitioner, M/s F.A. Enterprise, a registered partnership firm, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Pronounces Order on Petition Filed by Canara Bank Seeking Directions Against Warehousing Authority and Warehouseman. The Petition Involves Claims Regarding Non-Cooperation in Segregation and Verification of Pledged Goods Covered by Electronic Negotiable Warehouse Receipts Issued Under the Warehousing (Development and Regulation) Act, 2007.
17 Sep 2025This writ petition was filed by Canara Bank under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, seeking directions against the Warehousing Development and...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Power Grid Corporation's Writ Petitions Against Execution Proceedings for Land Acquisition Compensation — Held That Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction to Entertain Execution Petition for Enhanced Compensation Under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and the Electricity Act, 2003.
7 Mar 2018The petitioner, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, a Government of India enterprise, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.
20 Mar 2013The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
18 Jul 2026The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Panchayat Election Schedule During COVID-19 Pandemic — State Election Commission's Power to Conduct Elections Under Article 243K and Goa Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Upheld. The court held that the election schedule was not arbitrary and that the Commission had taken adequate safety measures, dismissing petitions challenging the schedule.
11 Dec 2020The petitioners, who were candidates or intending candidates for the Goa Panchayat elections, challenged the election schedule notified by the Goa Sta...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.
22 Mar 2024The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...
- 141
