KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "equitable development"
979 result(s) found
Found 979 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Successor States to Pay Employees of State-Owned Corporations Following Bifurcation Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 — Prolonged Non-Payment Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.
1 Jan 2026The present writ petition was filed by the Bihar State Ardh Sarkari Arajpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others, representing thousands of employees of ...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Market Value Assessment Based on Auction Sale Prices with Deductions for Development Held Reasonable, Affirming High Court's Decision.
22 Apr 2025The dispute arose from cross-appeals concerning the assessment of market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in Narsingi and...
- 1443
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station — No Violation of Right to Development Found. Height restrictions imposed under Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934 and Rule 44 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 for safety of aircraft operations are reasonable and not arbitrary.
9 Dec 2022The petitioners, Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Shree Ramkrishn Enterprises, and Parikshit Miglani, filed a writ petition under Arti...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in U.P. Trade Tax Act Case on State Development Tax Adjustment. Court upheld High Court's decision that assessees are entitled to adjust State Development Tax within monetary limits specified in eligibility certificates under Section 4-A, rejecting proportional adjustment interpretation under Section 3-H(3) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
2 Mar 2022The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 3-H of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, which introduced the State Developme...
- 142
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Land Acquisition Lapse Challenge Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners, landowners, argued that acquisition for BTM Layout had lapsed due to non-payment of compensation, and the appeals arose from a Single Judge's common order dated 14.12.2017.
19 Apr 2021The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka. The appellants, landowners and ...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Municipal School Land — No Violation Found in Grant of IOD and Occupation Certificate. Court held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the construction or deviation from sanctioned plans, and the PIL was dismissed with costs.
25 Oct 2016The petitioner, Sanjay Krishna Chavan, claiming to be an RTI activist and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Cou...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Court held that disputed questions of title and possession cannot be decided in injunction proceedings without proper evidence.
17 Jan 2013The present appeals arise from a property dispute between M/s Girdhar Creations and others (original plaintiffs) and Baban Baburao Rathare and others ...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal for Injunction Against Demolition of Unauthorized Construction. Builder who constructed seven upper floors without permission and inducted flat purchasers without occupation certificate is not entitled to equitable relief of temporary injunction.
27 Apr 2005The appellant, M/s. Leela Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary injunctio...
- 159
