High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on OCI Cardholder's Plea for Admission to Medical Courses Under Hyderabad-Karnataka Quota. Petition Challenged Citizenship Requirement in Admission Notification for Government Seats.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Whether an Overseas Citizen of India cardholder is eligible for admission to MBBS/BDS under the Hyderabad-Karnataka Region reservation quota under Article 371J of the Constitution, and the validity of Clause 6 of the KEA Notification dated 09.01.2024 and Clause 6.1 of the Information Bulletin requiring citizenship for government seats.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (09) 64

Writ Petition No.15400/2024 (EDN-RES)

2024-09-04

N. V. Anjaria, K. V. Aravind

Ajoy Kumar Patil for petitioner, M.N. Sudev Hegde for R1 & R3, N.K. Ramesh for R2, K. Arvind Kamath for R4

Meghana Kuruvalli

State of Karnataka & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging notification clauses and seeking admission to MBBS/BDS under Article 371J quota.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash Clause 6 of the KEA Notification dated 09.01.2024 and Clause 6.1 of the Information Bulletin, to consider her case for admission under Article 371J quota, and to permit her to participate in seat allotment process.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, an OCI cardholder, was not allowed to register as an Indian citizen on KEA website and was clubbed with foreign nationals, thereby denied opportunity to claim reservation under Article 371J.

Issues

Whether an OCI cardholder is eligible for admission under the Hyderabad-Karnataka Region reservation quota under Article 371J? Whether Clause 6 of the KEA Notification dated 09.01.2024 and Clause 6.1 of the Information Bulletin are valid? Whether the Supreme Court decision in Anushka Rengunthwar applies to reservation seats? Whether clubbing OCI candidates with foreign nationals is justified?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contended that as an OCI cardholder, she should be treated on par with Indian citizens for admission to government seats, relying on Anushka Rengunthwar v. Union of India. She argued she studied in Hyderabad-Karnataka region for six years, satisfying eligibility under Article 371J, and that the notification clause unreasonably excludes OCI cardholders.

Judgment Excerpts

Clause 6 of the said Notification dealing with eligibility, reads as under, “Eligibility: As per Rule 5(1) of Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Government seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules 2006 (Amendments), No candidates shall be eligible for admission to Government Seats unless he is a citizen of India and satisfies any one of the eligibility conditions specified therein. the petitioner has studied for the last six years in Ballari, State of Karnataka, that she has completed her 10th standard examination from Ballari and further that she has appeared for the 2nd Pre University Certificate examination, the result of which is awaited. When the petitioner registered online with KEA to participate in the online counselling for admission to MBBS/ BDS seats in Karnataka, the KEA website permitted her to register as a Foreign National and not as Indian Citizen, contrary to the law laid down by the Apex Court ...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for various reliefs including quashing of certain clauses of the KEA notification and for consideration of her case for admission under Article 371J quota for the academic year 2024-25. The matter was heard and reserved for orders on 4th September 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Citizenship Act, 1955: Section 7A
  • Constitution of India: Article 371J, Article 226
  • Karnataka Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1984: Section 14
  • Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Government Seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2006: Rule 5, Rule 9
  • Karnataka Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission in Hyderabad Karnataka Region) Order, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Sets Aside Sessions Court Order in Election Affidavit Non-Disclosure Case. Court Holds Mere Cognizance of Criminal Case Not Disclosure Requirement Under Section 33A(1) of Representation of the People Act, 1951; Up...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Trial by Magistrate for CBI Case Transferred from Special Judge — Reference Under Section 395(2) CrPC Maintainable for Jurisdictional Doubt. The court held that the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has jurisdiction...