High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "district consumer commission"
436 result(s) found
Found 436 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.
27 Oct 2016The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...
- 174
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Considers Second Appeals on Maintainability of Civil Suits Involving Electricity Tariff Dispute – Core Issue Is Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003
31 Oct 2025The appellants, who were plaintiffs in the original suits, filed four separate suits (O.S. Nos. 613/2013, 612/2013, 610/2013, and 611/2013) before the...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against KERC Order on Solar Power Tariff. The Dispute Centers on Whether Commissioning Certificate or Actual Injection of Power Determines Commercial Operation Date Under the Power Purchase Agreement.
22 May 2023The petitioner, a solar power developer, challenged an order of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that denied a higher tariff by ...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
2 Mar 2016The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Fair Price Shop Malpractice Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Complainant Not Heard. Revision Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Audi Alteram Partem Under Maharashtra Essential Commodities Act.
15 Jan 2013The petitioner, Dattatraya Marotrao Sakhare, was the original complainant who, along with other card holders from village Konatha, filed a complaint o...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Consumer Forum Compensation for Railway Death Due to Negligence in Providing Safe Travel. Railway Administration Held Liable for Death of Passenger Thrown from Train by Miscreants as Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
20 Mar 2006The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the District Consumer Disputes...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.
8 Jan 2020The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Marketer in Weights and Measures Case — Manufacturer Already Convicted and Fined for Non-Declaration of Retail Sale Price Under Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977.
5 Dec 2006The applicants, Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeki...
- 105
Tribunals
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Vehicle Defect Case — Manufacturer Not Vicariously Liable for Independent Dealer's Service Deficiencies. Concurrent Findings of Lower Fora Set Aside as No Privity of Contract Exists Between Manufacturer and Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act.
18 Jun 2025The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the Managing Director of TATA Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited before the National Consumer Disputes Redre...
- 109
