Search Results for "development plan rejection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "development plan rejection"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction on Construction. Court holds that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting ad-interim injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie case.

21 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Land Conversion Rejection in KLR Act Case — Deputy Commissioner Directed to Reconsider Application Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Endorsement Without Reasons Quashed as Not a Speaking Order.

14 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Sri Suhail Rehaman, claimed to be the absolute owner of agricultural land bearing Sy.No.177/5 (old No.177) measuring 0-35 ½ guntas si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Ceiling Order Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 — Green Belt Land Inclusion Upheld. The Competent Authority's rejection of objections regarding inclusion of green belt land in the holding was affirmed, as the land was part of the urban agglomeration under Section 6(1) of the Act.

21 Mar 2006

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original land owner Chandrakant Trimbakrao Rajebahadur (Respondent No.5), filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction. Court held that the valuation of the suit for court fee purposes does not determine jurisdiction for the purpose of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, and the plaint cannot be rejected on the ground of undervaluation unless the court finds that the suit is not properly valued and the plaintiff fails to correct it within the time fixed.

3 Jan 2022

The petitioner, original defendant no.3, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 06.10.2020 passed by the learned 2nd C.J.S.D.,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. AGRC's order directing SRA to decide on eligibility of slum dwellers for rehabilitation based on cut-off date upheld as valid exercise of appellate jurisdiction under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

2 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Sateri Builders and Developers LLP (the Developer) and Shree Gurukrupa (SRA) Co-operative Ho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Challenging the Majority Arbitral Award's Decision on Quantum of Construction Costs. Petitioner, Claimant in Development Dispute, Asserts That Majority Award Erred in Awarding Cost at Rs.775 per sq.ft. Instead of Actual Cost of Rs.7.26 Crores and Failed to Grant Interest and Costs.

3 Jun 2019

The matter originated from a development agreement dated 29 October 1993 between the petitioner, Caprihans India Limited, and the respondent, Hindoost...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Development Agreement — Failure to Consider Limitation and Lack of Evidence of Agreement. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge succeeds as award based on letter dated November 4, 2003 read with unregistered document suffers from patent illegality and perversity.

12 Dec 2025

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award dated August 5, 2017, which had granted specific performance of a development agreement in favor of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Heard Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief in Land Development Dispute. Dispute Involved Conditions Precedent in Memorandum of Understanding and Effect of Revival of Show Cause Notice on Title to Leased Land.

23 Jul 2025

The judgment text provided contains the factual background and context of a commercial arbitration petition filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Stop Work Notice and Demolition Order in Cantonment Area — Holds That Repair of Old Grant Bungalow Does Not Require Prior Permission Under Revised Land Policy of 1995.

16 Oct 2020

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Smt. Homai Nussarwanji Pudumjee, were occupancy holders of bungalow No.6, Maneckji Mehta Road, Pune, an old grant...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)