Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

360 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 360 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within 10 Years. Petitioners' land reserved for school purposes not acquired despite notice; court declares reservation lapsed and directs publication of notification.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gat No. 105/2+3 at Village Bale, Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Decides Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Injunction Decree in Land Acquisition Dispute. Court's Final Decision Not Reached in Provided Text as Judgment Excerpt is Incomplete.

The appeal arose from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs, brother and sister, claiming ownership and possession of land in Survey...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for High School and Playground in Development Plan. Petitioners failed to show that reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 as no notice under Section 127 was issued.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.99 (now 99-A) and site Nos.142 and 145 at Malegaon, District Nasik, filed a writ petition seeking de...