Search Results for "capital reconstruction"

155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telecom Company in Industrial Dispute, Holding Regional Business Head Not a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Managerial and Supervisory Duties Exclude Employee from Section 2(s) Definition Despite Absence of Power to Appoint or Dismiss.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Bharti Airtel Limited against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Date of Birth Dispute, Setting Aside Award of Back Wages. Employee's Delayed Claim for Change of Date of Birth After 9 Years and Lack of Documentary Proof at Initial Stage Held to Be Unjustified and an Attempt to Take Double Advantage.

The present appeal arises from a dispute regarding the date of birth of respondent no.3, a former employee of Barsua Iron Ore Mines (a unit of SAIL). ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...