Search Results for "blood group analysis"

629 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 629 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Manoj s/o Harihar Shukla, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Ahmednagar, in Special (POCSO) Case No.199 of 2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape and Sodomy Case under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 377, 506. Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Child Victim Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony Under Section 157 Evidence Act; Minor Discrepancies in FIR Held Immaterial.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Ramesh Bansiram Pawar, by the Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No. 154 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction and Life Sentence for Murder Based on Dying Declarations. Admissibility of Video Recording as Dying Declaration without Certificate under Section 65-B of Evidence Act Challenged.

The High Court of Karnataka heard an appeal filed by the accused against his conviction and sentence of life imprisonment and fine for the offence of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness, a child relative of the deceased, gave inconsistent and tutored testimony, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Avinash @ Pinya Ashok Jadhav, was convicted by the 4th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Sewree, Mumbai, for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC. The Court Assessed the Evidence of a Sole Interested Eye-Witness and the Effect of Hostile Witnesses.

The two criminal appeals arise from Sessions Case No. 234 of 2008, wherein the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune convicted six accused persons for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeals of Convicted Appellants in Murder Case — Delay in Recording Statement of Seriously Injured Witness Held Not Fatal When Medical Assistance Prioritized. Witness Credibility Not Affected by Minor Omissions if Medical Evidence Corroborates Injuries.

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad decided two criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 1 of 2008, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.49 of 2001 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Double Murder and Criminal Conspiracy. Convictions Under Sections 302, 120B, 364 IPC and Arms Act Based on Circumstantial Evidence Challenged on Merits.

The case pertains to the murder of Advocate Pradeep Nalamwar and Vijay Bisne, allegedly carried out at the behest of accused no. 4 Swami, the landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case arises from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and rioting...