Search Results for "binding contract"

2857 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2857 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Recovery Order in Contract Dispute — Unilateral Recovery Without Notice Violates Natural Justice. Petitioner's dues cannot be withheld without prior notice and opportunity of hearing under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Michigan Engineers Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure and construction services, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sale of New Tenure Land by Adivasi Requires Government Permission; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant, Shantaben Gopalbhai Tadvi, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Challenged Interim Measures Granted by Arbitral Tribunal in Terminalling Service Agreement Dispute.

The petitioner, Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., constructed port terminal facilities at Dahej, Gujarat, including tanks for handling and expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal by Subsequent Purchasers Against Decree of Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell. High Court's Ruling That Original Vendees Were Entitled to Specific Performance Despite Contract Termination and Subsequent Sale Is Under Review.

These appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Karnataka which allowed two appeals filed by the original ven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Incorporation of Arbitration Clause by Reference in Sale Orders Under Coal Distribution Scheme. General Reference to Guidelines Containing Arbitration Clause is Sufficient Under Section 7(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present civil appeal arose from an order of the Jharkhand High Court rejecting an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave to Sue in Summary Suit for Goods Sold and Delivered Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Article 39 of the contract required all legal proceedings only in Calcutta High Court, ousting Bombay High Court's jurisdiction.

The Plaintiff, Pacific Refractories Ltd., filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court against the Defendant, Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd.,...