Search Results for "appellate interference"

7676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Decree on Limitation and Appellate Court Procedure. Agreement for Sale of House Property Enforced Despite Defendant’s Failure to Lead Evidence and Plea of Limitation, as Burden of Proof Not Discharged.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a house property. The respondent (original plaintiff) claimed that on 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jethabhai Manjibhai Hadiyal, a Talati-cum-Mantri, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Entry Tax Case — Pre-deposit Condition for Appeal Not Applicable When Entire Tax is Disputed. Section 28(3)(a) of Goa Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 2000 requires pre-deposit only of tax 'not disputed' in appeal, not disputed tax.

The petitioner, M/s. West Coast Ingots Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was served a demand notice under the Goa Tax o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.

The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...