ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010
8 Jan 2016The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...
Search Results for "agreement termination"
2071 result(s) found
Found 2071 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.
28 Feb 2014The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Termination Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. College Tribunal's order setting aside termination of lecturer for lack of approval from University and Education Officer was valid under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.
23 Dec 2021The appellant, Mahadeorao Ramchandra Khadatkar, was appointed as a lecturer in economics at Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Arts and Commerce (Evening) College...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.
18 Jul 2012The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Oil Corporation, Upholds Termination of Dealership for Violation of Marketing Discipline Guidelines. Stock Variation and Sample Failure Constitute Critical Irregularities Justifying Termination Under Clause 8.2 of MDG 2012.
1 Jan 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court which had set asid...
- 335
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
28 Nov 2025The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Writ Petition Lies Against National Stock Exchange for Termination. Maintainability Questioned on Grounds That NSE is Not State Under Article 12 and Dispute is Contractual.
16 Oct 2025The petitioner, Suprabhat Lala, was appointed as a Manager with the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on 1 October 2001 under terms and conditions set out...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Refers Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The Court held that the referral court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must only examine the existence of an arbitration agreement on a prima facie basis, and the group of companies doctrine can bind a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement.
20 Sep 2024The present petition was filed under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole...
- 345
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.
6 May 2011The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...
- 116
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.
8 Jul 2025The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...
- 45
