Search Results for "agreement holder"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "agreement holder"

2021 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2021 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Against Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale — Appeal Filed Under Section 96 CPC Challenging Findings on Readiness and Willingness and Order II Rule 2 Bar. The Appeal Raises Issues of Maintainability Under Order II Rule 2 CPC and Proof of Readiness and Willingness.

11 Aug 2023

The dispute arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property dated 15.03.2010 filed by the respondent-plaint...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

11 Jul 2014

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.

11 Jul 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Judgment-Debtor's Petition Seeking Rescission of Contract Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act — Decree-Holder's Failure to Deposit Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time Gives Right to Rescission, Subsequent Deposit Does Not Extinguish That Right.

6 Mar 2014

The petitioner, T.L. Rajagopal, was the defendant/judgment-debtor in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 16.08.1997 filed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.

29 Jul 2026

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition by Bangalore Development Authority for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Claim Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Prior Attachment and Lack of Possession. The court held that a claim petition under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC is not maintainable when the property was attached before judgment and the claimant was not in possession at the time of attachment.

23 May 2018

The appellant, Swamy H.L., filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC against the judgment and decree dated 19.09.2008 passed by the First Ap...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim by Co-owner. Court holds that a co-owner in possession cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is ouster or denial of title, and that a preliminary decree for partition can be passed even if some properties are not available for division.

12 Nov 2021

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2015...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)