Search Results for "adjournment rejection"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Decree as Not Maintainable Under Section 96(3) CPC. Appeal Against Consent Terms Recorded Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Is Barred by Law.

The case involves an appeal filed by Girja Shankar G. Gupta and others against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Witnesses in Civil Suit. Court holds that trial court erred in dismissing IA for recall of PW-1 for further cross-examination without considering the principles of natural justice and fair opportunity.

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.4067/2009 pending before the XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, filed a writ pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'No Cross' Order in NI Act Case — Right to Cross-Examine Cannot Be Denied Without Giving Opportunity. Accused's Right to Cross-Examine Complainant's Witness Is a Valuable Right and Cannot Be Extinguished by Defaulting on Costs.

The petitioner, original accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Late Filing of Written Statement in Civil Suit — Violation of Order 8 Rule 1 CPC. Court holds that discretion to condone delay in filing written statement must be supported by sufficient cause and cannot be exercised mechanically.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 294/2010 pending before the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge (Rural), Ahmedabad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Family Court Orders in Divorce Case. Husband's Absence Justified Orders of No Written Statement and Interim Maintenance.

The petitioner husband filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Family Court, Mumbai dated 5th January 2010 and 5th April 2010 in a divorce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Municipal Election Result Due to Minor Name Discrepancy. Variation in Name Between Electoral Roll and Nomination Form Does Not Constitute Corrupt Practice Under Section 33 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioner, Ansari Sana Masood, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Small Cause Court, Mumbai, which dismissed her election peti...