Search Results for "acquisition lapse"

722 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 722 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reservation Lapses Under Section 127 MRTP Act When Authority Fails to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court held that reservation of land under the Development Plan lapses under Section 127 of the MRTP Act if the Planning Authority fail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Title Over BDA Acquired Land — Petitioner Fails to Establish Possession or Title After 1971 Acquisition Notification Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945.

The petitioner, Sri Venu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the respondents hav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Declaration Under Section 6 Renders Proceedings Lapsed.

The petitioner, Smt. Nilima Mahesh Bhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of land acquisition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition for Release of Land from Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over 45 Years. Land Reserved for Garden and Ring Road Since 1958 Deemed Released as Authority Failed to Act Within Six Months of Section 127 Notice.

The petitioner, Rajendra Rameshwardas Gindodiya, owned land Survey No.569/1 admeasuring 2 hectares and 12 ares in Dhule, which was ancestral property....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to Gross Delay and Laches. Petitioner's failure to establish tenancy and inordinate delay in challenging notifications under Land Acquisition Act bars relief.

The petitioner, Vinayak Bhaskar Sinai Dhume, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging notifications dated 7th April 1999 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lack of Title. Petitioners failed to prove ownership of the acquired land, and the acquisition was for a public purpose under the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain lands in Kolhapur, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for road widening...