APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 54 OF 2012
12 Mar 2015The matter involved two appeals from orders arising out of Special Civil Suit No.2/2012 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim. The...
Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"
307 result(s) found
Found 307 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
3 May 2018The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to ONGC's Decision to Open Price Bid of Technip in Tender for Onshore Terminal. Court holds that deficiencies in technical bid were curable and decision based on Independent External Monitor's recommendation was not arbitrary.
9 May 2014The Petitioner, KSS Petron Pvt. Ltd., challenged a communication dated 6th January 2014 from Respondent No.1, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ON...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation Order in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner's Wood Seized Without Proper Notice Under Section 61A of Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Proceedings Initiated Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.
14 Jul 2011The petitioner, Namdeo Narayan Dekate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of an order dated 1...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of the counterclaim without considering evidence and without granting an opportunity to be heard amounted to a patent illegality and breach of natural justice.
4 Feb 2025The petitioner, Marine Electricals (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside an arbi...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim as Time-Barred. Claim for pre-project expenses under MOU held barred by limitation as expenditure incurred prior to April 2001 and claim raised after three years.
9 Jan 2013The Petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 12 November 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal co...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who a...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
29 Apr 2013The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Orissa High Court's Order Quashing Land Settlement in Favour of Temple Managing Committee; Issue of 'Amrutamanohi' Lands Under OEA Act and Temple Act
1 Aug 2026The dispute centered on the settlement of certain lands in Puri, known as 'amrutamanohi' properties, which were claimed to be part of the endowments o...
- 50
