Search Results for "Rules 1981"

2388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court’s Recognition of Trade Union Under MRTU & PULP Act. Recognition Granted Based on Retrospective Membership Payments Raises Question of Legal Validity.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 3 March 1998 of the Industrial Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Inter Se Seniority Dispute Among Teachers Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 — Seniority Determined by Date of Entry into Category Based on Qualifications

The dispute in this appeal pertains to the inter se seniority of the appellant and the 5th respondent, both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a secon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Writ Petition Challenging Reinstatement and Back Wages of Teacher. Oral Termination of Employee with Over Five Years' Service Found Unlawful; Appointment Order Under Rule 9(5) of MEPS Rules, 1981, Established Valid Employment.

The management of a private school filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment of the School Tribunal, Aurangabad, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Airport Land Acquisition in Marol Village — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 90 per sq. m. for 1981 and 1982 Notifications. Court Relies on Expert Valuer's Report and Rejects SLAO's Low Valuation Based on Inadequate Comparable Sales.

The judgment pertains to two Land Acquisition References (LAR No.18 of 1988 and LAR No.19 of 1988) filed by A.H. Wadia Charity Trust (the Claimant) se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit Challenging Will on Grounds of Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. Will dated 9th March 1981 held not duly executed and attested as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar (since deceased, represented by her sons Sunil and Harish) seeking Letters of...