WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2019
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"
554 result(s) found
Found 554 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.
31 Aug 2023The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Part and Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value of Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Upheld with Reduced Deduction for Small Landholders. Court Relies on Precedent for Same Village and Modifies Development Charges Deduction from 30% to 20% for Landholders with Less Than 2 Hectares.
27 Sep 2022The case involves two cross-appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the Katepurna Morna Project in...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.
24 Jan 2020The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
4 Apr 2019The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Land Reserved for D.P. Road and Social Welfare Not Acquired Within Reasonable Time After Purchase Notice. The court held that re-reservation in a revised development plan cannot revive a lapsed reservation under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
21 Jan 2016The petitioners, owners of agricultural land bearing Gat No.87/1 at Mouza Digras, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation of ...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization for Construction on Land Reserved for Garden Under MRTP Act.
15 Jul 2015The petitioner, Mohammed Ibrahim Abdul Khalique, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of a structure on a plo...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
30 Mar 2015The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.
10 Sep 2012The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development of Textile Mill Lands in Mumbai — Heritage Conservation and Public Interest Claims Rejected as Premature and Without Merit. The court held that no cause of action arises until a final decision is made by the Heritage Conservation Committee or other authorities.
5 May 2006The Bombay High Court dismissed three notices of motion in a writ petition filed by the Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and...
- 99
