Search Results for "Maharashtra Forest Rules"

421 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 421 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Municipal Corporation's Promotion Process for Superintending Engineer Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Court Directions and Violation of Service Rules

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by four Executive Engineers of Municipal Corporation challenging their exclusion from promotion to Superi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.

The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tahsildar's Orders for Vehicle Seizure and Demand of Royalty for Sand Transportation Beyond Permit Time. Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Violation of Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1963.

The petitioners, owners of vehicles transporting sand, challenged show cause notices and final orders passed by the Tahsildar demanding payment of roy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Resolution Prescribing Fees for Permission to Mortgage Occupancy Class II Lands. Condition Imposing Payment of Fees Held Valid Under Section 43 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Not Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in paper manufacturing, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty and Confiscation Orders in Sand Mining Cases for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for lack of hearing; matters remanded for fresh consideration.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. In Writ Petition No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Chief Secretary's Order in Water Release PIL for Kumbhmela. Court holds that release of water from Gangapur Dam for holy baths during drought must comply with Government Resolution prioritizing drinking water.

The petitioner, Hiralal Motilal Desarda, a professor and activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the State Government's decision to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Sarpanch Election for Lack of Locus Standi and Alternative Remedy. Non-Voters Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Under Article 226 for Election Irregularities Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, who are residents of Bhandara district but not voters in the concerned Gram Panchayat, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...