Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

591 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 591 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reinstatement Order in Forgery Case. Industrial Court's Power to Grant Reinstatement Without Remand Under Section 44 MRTU & PULP Act Upheld as Enquiry Findings Were Perverse.

2 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the order of the Industrial Court which, in revision under Section 44...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

26 Oct 2016

The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Termination Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai lacks jurisdiction as cause of action arose in Silchar, Assam, and contract clause limiting jurisdiction to Bombay does not apply to industrial disputes under MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Anil Murlidharan, was employed by M/s. Larsen and Toubro Limited as a Eutectician from 26 July 1995. He was initially posted at Va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Maharashtra Police Academy Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Held that the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as the petitioner is not an 'industry' under the Act.

15 Oct 2025

The present Writ Petition was filed by the Maharashtra Police Academy (Petitioner) challenging the Judgment dated 09.02.2025 passed by the Industrial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Employer to Pay for Workmen's Defence Advocate. No Statutory Obligation on Employer to Bear Cost of Advocate for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

7 Oct 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 by ordering reinstatement without back wages when the domestic inquiry was fair and punishment not disproportionate.

20 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd., challenged the orders of the Labour Court dated 5.3.2005 and 3.10.2005, which directed reinstatement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Closure of Factory by Employer Held Not Prima Facie Illegal Despite Assurance to Employees. The Court held that the Industrial Court misapplied the tests for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU & PULP Act, as closure is a right of the employer and the assurance regarding a different unit did not make the closure illegal.

9 Aug 2018

The Petitioner, Viraj Engineering Company, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing engineering components, decided to close its factory on 9 March...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Industrial Court's Reversal of Labour Court's Finding of Victimization Set Aside. The Court held that the Industrial Court erred in reversing the Labour Court's order without properly considering evidence of victimization and biased enquiry under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

15 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Shantaram Yashwant Mahale, a former employee of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), filed a writ petition challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)