Search Results for "Judicial officers recall"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manoj @ Manya Pandurang Kadam, Pranay @ Pintya Ramesh Pawar, and Pradeep @ Dadya Atmaram Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Procedural Irregularities and Denial of Opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits after the Single Judge dismissed the writ petition without hearing.

The appellant, Bimal Kantilal Mehata, owned land in Bengeri village, Hubli, which was acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer on 28.10.2010 under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused as Prosecution Failed to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120-B, 302 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.

The State of Goa appealed against the judgment dated 10.07.2003 passed by the Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 18/2000, whereby respondent nos. 1, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate Enrollment Rules. Court upholds Bar Council of India's power to prescribe enrollment conditions under Section 49 of Advocates Act, 1961 and rejects challenge to election process for lack of merit.

The petitioner, Manubhai Paragji Vashi, an advocate aged about 79 years, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election p...