Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &
26 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner jurisdiction"
370 result(s) found
Found 370 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.
17 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...
- 1114
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Auction Purchaser in SARFAESI Act Case — High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition Despite Alternative Remedy. Restoration of Securitization Application After Full Payment and Sale Certificate Issuance Held Improper.
10 Apr 2024The appeal arises from an order of the Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, which set aside the DRT's order dismi...
- 628
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction in Eco-Sensitive Zone Near Old Goa — No Violation of Environmental Laws Found. Court held that construction of residential houses by private individuals on private land does not require prior environmental clearance under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, and that the Eco-Sensitive Zone notification does not prohibit construction per se.
29 Feb 2024The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sandeep Azrenkar and Goa Foundation, an environmental NGO, against the State of G...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Tenancy Rights Over Land in Absence of Mutation Entry and Adverse Possession. The court held that the burden to prove tenancy lies on the claimant and that the claim was barred by limitation as the petitioners had not been in possession for over 12 years.
16 Jun 2022The petitioners, Shamrao Rambhau Konde and Gulabrao Rambhau Konde, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2003-2004 — Designated Authority Directed to Recompute Amount Payable After Considering Refund Already Paid. The Court held that the Designated Authority must consider refunds paid under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while computing the amount payable under the DTVSV Act, and apply the principle of set off under Section 245 of the IT Act.
25 Aug 2021The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.
27 Feb 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...
- 258
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting of Contractor Without Hearing, Directs Reconsideration of Monetary Claims. Municipal Corporation's Decision to Blacklist Contractor Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice.
23 Aug 2013The petitioner, a registered municipal contractor, filed two writ petitions. In WP 569/2013, he challenged the decision dated 14.2.2013 and circular d...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development of Textile Mill Lands in Mumbai — Heritage Conservation and Public Interest Claims Rejected as Premature and Without Merit. The court held that no cause of action arises until a final decision is made by the Heritage Conservation Committee or other authorities.
5 May 2006The Bombay High Court dismissed three notices of motion in a writ petition filed by the Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Property Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Parties. Will Clause Cannot Substitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Mrs. Padmini Chandran Menon, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...
- 39
