Search Results for "Central Government employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Central Government employee"

2140 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2140 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Labour Court's Jurisdiction Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act. The Court Considers Whether a Disputed Claim of Arrears of Salary Can Be Adjudicated in a Section 33(C)(2) Proceeding Without Prior Adjudication of the Workman's Status.

13 Apr 2023

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Working Journalists Act Case Excluding Perquisites from Gratuity Calculation. Ex-Employee's Gratuity Claim Not Barred; Car Allowance, Free Telephone and Newspapers Not Wages Under Section 2(rr) of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955.

2 Apr 1969

The dispute arose out of a claim for gratuity and leave compensation filed by a former special correspondent of Bennett Coleman & Co. (P) Ltd. under t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Group of Writ Petitions From Uniaided School Employees Seeking Pension and Service Benefits. The Petitioners Include Various Unions and Individuals Claiming Pension and Other Benefits Against the State of Maharashtra.

1 Jan 1970

The case consists of a group of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioners incl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Actual Monthly Wages Must Be Used for Computation. The Court held that the notification under Section 4(1B) does not cap wages; actual wages proved can be adopted, and the amendment deleting the deeming provision applies to pending proceedings.

13 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court enhancing compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Examines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts under MRTU Act Amidst Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents. The Court Considers Whether the Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Abhay Raj Jain Stands Impliedly Overruled by Nandram v. Garware Polyester Limited and Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd. for Determining Cause of Action in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints.

3 Nov 2025

This judgment deals with a batch of appeals and writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay involving a common question of territoria...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Employee for Complying with Tribunal Summons — Compliance with Witness Summons Issued Under Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Violate Conduct Rules. The Court held that an employee cannot be suspended for obeying a lawful summons from a judicial or quasi-judicial authority, as it is a legal duty and not misconduct under the Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai Services (Conduct) Rules, 1999.

24 Feb 2021

The Petitioner, Kiran Ramesh Waghela, joined the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) in 1995 as a P.T. Mukadam and was later promoted to Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

3 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

28 Sep 2018

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2063 OF 2025

9 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)