Search Results for "Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959"

290 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 290 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Building Contractors' Appeals Against Purchase Tax Assessment Under M.P. Sales Tax Act. Notice Period Directory, Contractors Held 'Dealers', and Consumption of Materials in Construction Attracts Purchase Tax Under Section 7.

The appellants, a firm of building contractors registered as dealers under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, purchased taxable building ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act to Nullify Registered Sale Deeds. Multiple writ petitions challenge orders directing reconveyance of agricultural land alleged to be security for unlicensed money lending.

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 21 writ petitions collectively, all challenging orders passed by the Taluka Assistant Registr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Disallowance of Capital Losses and Business Loss on Guarantee Transactions. Tribunal's findings on sham transactions and lack of commercial substance affirmed under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Killick Nixon Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Refund of Rs.56 Crore Service Tax Deposit Retained Without Authority of Law. Petitioner Bank's deposit made under protest to buy peace on interchange income cannot be retained without show cause notice or adjudication order.

The petitioner, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the retent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Sales Tax Auction of Property Already Secured Under SARFAESI Act. Securitisation Act Overrides State Revenue Recovery Laws Under Section 35, and Sale Must Be Conducted by Secured Creditor.

The petitioners, Viraat Ispat Limited and another, challenged an auction notice dated 13 September 2011 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales ...