Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1694 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1694 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Customs Department Appeal Against Interim Order Directing Release of Areca Nuts Consignment Without Bank Guarantee. Court Holds That Provisional Assessment Under Section 17 of Customs Act, 1962 Read with CAROTAR, 2020 Requires Bond and Bank Guarantee for Release Pending Verification of SAFTA Certificate of Origin.

27 Apr 2026

The present intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports) and other competent authoritie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 482 Petition Challenging Issuance of Process in Legal Metrology Case Despite Alternate Remedy. Once a petition is admitted and heard on merits, it cannot be dismissed as not maintainable merely because a revision could have been filed.

26 Sep 2017

The applicant, Volvo India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Bombay High Court...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Records of Import of Ground Handling Equipment During Aero India Shows. Petitioners failed to establish any specific instance of smuggling or violation of law, and the petition was found to be based on vague allegations and unsubstantiated claims.

31 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Alleging Smuggling of Sensitive Materials During Aero India Shows for Lack of Credible Material and Public Interest. The Court held that a Public Interest Litigation must be based on bonafide intentions and concrete evidence, not on vague allegations or newspaper reports, and dismissed the petition as an abuse of process.

31 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Composition Tax Application Under KVAT Act. Rule 135(4) of KVAT Rules, 2005 restricting composition scheme for dealers selling liquor held ultra vires Section 15 of KVAT Act, 2003.

7 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, operates a composite business including an amusement park, a 3-star hotel, and a restaurant. It applie...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on limitation is a question of fact not open to revision under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.

25 Mar 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (KAIT Act) against ord...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid. The court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves multiple civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal allowing appeal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act Runs from Date of Service of Order. The court held that the word 'passed' in Section 55(1) must be read as 'served' to give effect to the right of revision, and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has power to condone delay under Section 32(5)(a) of the Act.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

137 138 139 140 141

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)