Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

5218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5218 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Interface Between Section 43-D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Article 21 of Constitution of India, and Propriety of Smaller Benches Diluting Larger Bench Decision on Bail. The Appeal Arises from High Court Dismissal of Bail Under UAPA and NDPS Act, Raising Questions on Compatibility of Bail Restrictions with Right to Personal Liberty.

1 Jan 1970

The appellant, a government employee and political activist associated with the Jammu & Kashmir People's Conference, was initially taken into preventi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods

11 Dec 2025

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

13 Jun 2016

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.

5 May 2006

The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Directs State Government to Expedite Land Allotment for New High Court Complex in PIL on Court Infrastructure. Need for Adequate Judicial Infrastructure Recognized as Fundamental to Rule of Law; State Obligated to Provide Suitable Premises.

22 Jan 2019

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by an advocate practicing at the Bombay High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Order Challenging Injunction Against Builder's Construction on Redeveloped Plot. Consent of Flat Purchasers and Right to Use Additional FSI Questioned.

14 Jan 2010

The matter arose from a civil suit filed by forty-three flat purchasers against the promoter/builder, M/s. Noopur Developers, seeking a permanent inju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Partition Suit Due to Disputed Parentage. The Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Finding on Relationship Based on Documentary Evidence Including School Certificates and Tax Receipts.

13 Jun 2025

The regular first appeal was filed by the appellant, who was the plaintiff No.1 in the original suit, challenging the judgment and decree dated 22.09....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Procedure Case — Suit Must Proceed De Novo After Plaint Returned for Lack of Jurisdiction. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement Ousts Jurisdiction of Gurgaon Court, Rendering Proceedings Void Ab Initio Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference arising from a suit for recovery filed by the respondent against the appellant based on a franchise agreement...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Agreement to Sell. Trial court's finding that no agreement was executed and no advance paid upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court's refusal to decree specific performance of agreement to sell, finding plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

136 137 138 139 140

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)