Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to 50% Women Reservation in BMC Elections — Amendment to Section 5A of BMC Act Upheld as Valid Policy Decision. Reservation for Women in Local Bodies Permissible Under Article 243T and Not Violative of Basic Structure.

The petitioner, Kapoorchand Durgaprasad Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the amendment to Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Education Service Dispute — Illegal Termination Violates M.E.P.S. Rules. Employee's discontinuation without inquiry and notice held illegal; employer directed to reinstate with back wages and continuity.

The case involves an appeal by an educational institution and its headmaster against a common judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Stent Manufacturer from Tender Process. Petitioner's Drug Eluting Stents, Approved by DCGI, Held Eligible for Supply Under Rajiv Gandhi Arogya Yojana.

The Petitioner, M/s. Vascular Concepts Ltd., a company manufacturing Drug Eluting Stents, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...