Search Results for "power exchange"

2010 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2010 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Container Lease Dispute — Defendant Fails to Raise Triable Issues. Plaintiff entitled to decree for unpaid replacement value of lost containers under Equipment Agreement dated 30th December 2002.

The Plaintiff, Florens Containers Inc., filed a summary suit against the Defendant, M/s. Ornate Multimodal Carriers Pvt. Ltd., for recovery of US$ 58,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Service of Summons.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of a contract filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellants/defendants. The trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Centre Project. Claimant's Appeal Partly Allowed; State's Appeal Dismissed.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition reference. The claimant, Arvind Bhaskar Limaye, owned land in Survey No.48/B admea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Suit Challenging Transfer of Flat by Executors Before Probate. The court set aside the trial court's order appointing a Receiver and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of balance of convenience.

The appeals arose from an order dated 13 March 2014 of the learned Trial Judge in a notice of motion taken out by the plaintiffs in a suit seeking to ...