Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

3223 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3223 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator After Respondents Failed to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Invocation of Arbitration Clause.

The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, entered into a contract agreement with the respondents, the South Western ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Management Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 as Findings Are Plausible. Arbitrator's Finding of Breach of Contract and Award of Damages Upheld as Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, Hotel Corporation of India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Service Tax Levy on Irrigation Restoration Charges Paid to State Government. State's Collection of Charges for Water Diversion is a Sovereign Function, Not a Taxable Service Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Rattan India Power Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challeng...