Search Results for "landlord's claim"

1418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Child Abuse Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 324, 201 IPC and Goa Children's Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dr. Vasudev Deshprabhu, was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside SDO's Possession Order Under Section 120(c) of MTAL Act — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Revision Beyond Limitation and Allowing Amendment Without Notice.

The petitioner, a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, owned agricultural land survey 209 admeasuring 35 acres at mouza Umarkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reinstates Conviction Under Section 138. Partial Recovery Before Cheque Issuance Does Not Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act When Cheque Covers Balance Due.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Sessions Court, Amravati, which set aside the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Declaration of Title — Remand Order Set Aside for Failure to Decide Limitation and Jurisdiction Issues. First Appellate Court Must Decide All Issues Before Remanding Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.

The present appeal from order was filed by the original defendants challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned District Judge-12, Auranga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Reference Court's failure to consider potential for development and higher potential value leads to inadequate compensation under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the claimants (legal heirs of Bakshi Kanhu Rathod) against the judgment and order dated 18.3.1996 passed by th...