Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2250 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2250 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Order under Section 55 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 set aside as authority did not consider whether proceedings under Section 107 of CrPC would suffice.

The petitioner, a resident of Kunigal Taluk, challenged an externment order dated 15-12-2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Sub Divisional M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Relatives in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Omnibus Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and DV Act complaint quashed for lack of specific overt acts against appellants.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by Appellants, quashing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord between (complainant) and her husband ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against CBI Investigation Order in NSEL Scam Case. Court holds that an applicant not an accused has no locus standi to challenge investigation orders under Section 397 CrPC.

The applicant, Jignesh Prakash Shah, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Interim Compensation Under Section 140 MV Act Cannot Be Kept in Abeyance. Tribunal erred in deferring no-fault liability compensation pending final adjudication of main claim petition.

The appellant, K.L. Vidyashankar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for injuries sustained...