Search Results for "interim stage"

6509 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6509 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Involving Perfume Brands. Court restrains defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and artistic logos, finding prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiffs, Ahmed Perfumes LLC and M/s. Ahmed Al Maghribi Perfumes Trading LLC, both UAE-based companies in the perfume business, filed a Commerci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arrest Warrant in Maintenance Case — Failure to Consider Objections and Lack of Proper Service Render Order Unsustainable. Family Court directed to reconsider husband's objections in proceedings under Section 125 CrPC after ensuring proper service of notice.

The petitioner, Sri Sailesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Interim Maintenance Award Under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act. Wife's Higher Qualification and WhatsApp Chat About Earning Capacity Not Sufficient to Deny Maintenance; Husband's Income Inferred from Status.

The petitioner husband, Vijay Dhondiram Ghadage, challenged the order dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Family Court, Nashik in P.A. No.52 of 2014, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Refers Dispute to Arbitration. Holds That Arbitration Agreement Is Valid and Not Null and Void, Inoperative, or Incapable of Being Performed.

The petitioner, Bottero S.p.A., filed an arbitration petition under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to refer the dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Family Court Order Striking Out Defence in Divorce Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Grant Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses Before Striking Out Defence Under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The petitioner, Dr. Deepak Kumar M.M., and the respondent, Dr. Poornima S., were married on 15 December 2010 in Bangalore. The respondent filed a divo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Cross-Examination Application in DRT Proceedings — Failure to File Evidence Affidavit Justifies Denial of Cross-Examination Under Rule 12(6) of RDDBFI (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

The appellants, M/s Perfect Polybaags Private Ltd. and its directors, were defendants in Original Application No.239/2011 pending before the Debt Reco...