Search Results for "agricultural lands"

2234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Reopening Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Quashed as Issued After 16 Years.

The petitioner, Shivram A. Galbe, was a landholder in village Devegaon, Tq. Pathri, Dist. Parbhani. He filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Already Adequate. Market Value of Acquired Land at Rs.120 per sq.m. Was Higher Than Comparable Sale Instances.

The appellant, Jagdish Shriram Poddar, owned agricultural lands bearing survey nos. 22/1 and 22/4, area 1.51 HR, at Mouja Chichala, Wardha. For constr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit Over Agricultural Land — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when both lower courts have consistently found possession in favour of the plaintiff.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against a decree of injunction granted in favour of the original plain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Son for Murder of Father Over Land Dispute — Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed. The court found the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jagan Nanda Khairnar, was convicted by the First Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Lavasa Hill Station Project for Lack of Credible Material. Petitioner's vague allegations against politicians and officials did not establish a prima facie case for criminal investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav, an agriculturist and advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a direction for registrati...