Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Dispute Over Property Rights and Possession. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Without Proper Application of Mind and Without Considering Prima Facie Case.

The revision application was filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) challenging the order dated 23.11.2017 passed by the trial court dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Impleadment Order in Civil Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Applicants Claiming Independent Title and Possession Over Suit Property Are Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioner, Gajanan Mahadeo Potdar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Aatpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit Based on Landlord's Bonafide Need for Redevelopment. Landlord's Purchase of Entire Property and Need for Expansion of Business for Son Constitute Bonafide Need Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The applicant, Shridhar K. Berde, was a monthly tenant in Gala No.1 of Municipal House No.2481, Ratnagiri. The original owner Vinayak Purushottam Dali...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...