Search Results for "agricultural lands"

2234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeals Arising from Sessions Case No. 215 of 2006. Appeals Challenge Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present matter, the appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, along with two other acquitted co-accused, were tried for the murder of six perso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Ownership Acquired After 31 December 1958 Does Not Entitle Landholder to Seek Possession Under Section 44 of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

This writ petition arose from a tenancy dispute under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The petitioner, Subhash Bagal, claimed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Confirms Revenue Tribunal's Order Upholding Landlord's Possession. Tenant Failed to Prove Tenancy Rights Over Disputed Land Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ramesh Balkrishna Vidwans, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune, which c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...