Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC in Suit for Declaration and Specific Performance -- Applicant Application Rejected, Anil Hariprasad Jejani's Suit to Proceed

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed Civil Revision Application No.117 of 2025 filed by Ramesh Bhagirath Rander (applicant/d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Return of Election Petition Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC in Zilla Panchayat Election Dispute. Ruling Clarifies That CPC Applies to Trial of Election Petitions Under Karnataka Panchayath Raj Act, 1993 When Act Is Silent on Jurisdictional Return.

The High Court of Karnataka considered a writ petition challenging an appellate order that directed the return of an election petition under Order 7 R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Procedural Irregularities and Denial of Opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits after the Single Judge dismissed the writ petition without hearing.

The appellant, Bimal Kantilal Mehata, owned land in Bengeri village, Hubli, which was acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer on 28.10.2010 under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reprimands Advocate for Misconduct in Civil Revision Application Arising from Obstructionist Proceedings. Court Holds Advocate Must Act as Officer of Court and Not as Mere Mouthpiece of Client, Citing Section 49(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

The matter arose from a civil revision application before the Bombay High Court filed by the applicant, an obstructionist and son of the judgment debt...