Search Results for "prior finding binding"

2554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Challenge to Declaration of Chandrapur as Dry District Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Order Dated 05.03.2015 and Section 139(1)(a) of the Act Challenged as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

This batch of writ petitions challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district. The petitioners, holders of licenses under the Maharashtra Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Section 80IA Deduction Case for Container Handling Cranes. Leasing of cranes to JNPT does not constitute developing, maintaining and operating an infrastructural facility under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Cricketer in BCCI Match-Fixing Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Hiken Naresh Shah, a professional cricketer, challenged his suspension order dated 12th July 2015 passed by the President of the Board...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Reverses Appellate Court's Finding of Adoption. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove valid adoption under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, as essential ceremonies of giving and taking were not established.

The present regular second appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the defendant, assailing the judgment and decree of the appellate court wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...